New comment

Name:
Email:
Homepage:
Location:
JavaScript support is required for this form to work.
Calculate:	92 plus 6 equals
Subject:
Entry text: [quote="voracity"]Heh, actually, it's more like a HTMLRunner. The difference is important, because XUL is non-standard. Your right, speed is crucial, and that's part of the point. If browser UI developers have to do the exact same things as web developers, then they will solve a whole heap of speed issues for their browser applications that will also solve the speed issues that have been plaguing web developers with their web applications for years. (Thankfully, that's already been happening for a couple of years.) In addition, it will also make hackability a whole lot more accessible than the current XUL-based Mozilla browsers. In this regard, there are a lot of similarities to the whole Jetpack vs XUL-based extensions approach. Indeed, if the browser were built from HTML, there wouldn't even be a Jetpack vs XUL-based issue. Again, that's why a HTMLRunner is different to a XULRunner. :)[/quote]
I accept and follow the policy of Home of KaiRo.

This entry supports emoji, bbCode, and some HTML codes.