New comment

Name:
Email:
Homepage:
Location:
JavaScript support is required for this form to work.
Calculate:	31 minus 6 equals
Subject:
Entry text: [quote="rsx11m"]On Gerv's question, I'd say that the differences between SeaMonkey and FF/TB are actually increasing rather than decreasing. Firefox is busy coping with its competitors MSIE, Chrome, and Safari, and I personally don't like the UX design either of those has been going (including FF 4.0). Thunderbird has to fight with Outlook and Apple Mail (and some of its own spin-offs) and growing webmail competition. Some of TB's UX-design and backend changes (which SeaMonkey didn't follow) haven't been well received, along with new search functions that conceptually sound good but turned out to be a resource hog and in some cases buggy. Where does SeaMonkey fit into this mix? While it has to react to whatever happens in the core code, the current course of evaluating which feature is useful and what's not, thus retaining the basic user experience rather than making sudden changes while nevertheless benefiting from improvements, is just the way and want SeaMonkey to go. It has a solid user base which doesn't care about the pressure from what other browsers and e-mail clients do (and may actually catch former FF/TB users disagreeing with their course). Yes, that user base may be smaller than those for the mainstream-oriented applications, but it is strongly committed to the project and would certainly miss SeaMonkey if it wasn't there.[/quote]
I accept and follow the policy of Home of KaiRo.

This entry supports emoji, bbCode, and some HTML codes.