Langpacks for ChatZilla in SeaMonkey 2.0.3 L10n builds do not work.
They use /extensions/irc/xpi/locale-resources/install.rdf (or /extensions/irc/locales/generic/install.rdf ?), and it's em:maxVersion for SeaMonkey is "2.0".
2010-02-09 02:54
<< Who Dat Sey Dey Gonna Beat Dem Saints! | The roads I take... | Integration eines Magento-2-Webshops mit FreeFinance und selbstgebautem Warenmanagement >>
Entry written by KaiRo and posted on February 8th, 2010 22:40 | Tags: L10n, Mozilla, SeaMonkey, Status | 9 comments | TrackBack
Comments
Author | Entry |
---|---|
2ch-user | Sorry for posting here, because I do not have bugzilla/newsgroup account. Langpacks for ChatZilla in SeaMonkey 2.0.3 L10n builds do not work. They use /extensions/irc/xpi/locale-resources/install.rdf (or /extensions/irc/locales/generic/install.rdf ?), and it's em:maxVersion for SeaMonkey is "2.0". 2010-02-09 02:54 |
Webmaster | @2ch-user: You could at least search Bugzilla, which doesn't need any login, and then find bug 540842 tracking this. 2010-02-09 13:35 |
EP | so far there's been little to no discussion on EOL for SM 1.x lately. that's just my gut feeling. I do know that maybe an upcoming SM 1.1.19 release will follow after the MozillaMessenging people releases Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 later this year. so far, no timetable as to if and when TB 2.0.0.24 will be ready. 2010-02-09 17:18 |
2ch-user | |
Jota.Ce | Hi. I want to thank your great work in SM2 again, and tell you i'm the only one who likes small buttons xD But as i'm not an active developer i have no rights to complaint about buttons, sizes, positions,... (or should i?). Anyway, i only wanted to ask for one thing i always thought about (and all browser devs should think about)... When a browser knows the size of a download (sometimes it doesn't), and that download ends prematurely (without finishing full download size)... it *should* be impressively easy to check if expected size and final size mismatch, and if so, then retry the download or try to append from file end (or a small amount of bytes before the end). You could even ask for an answer from the user, but at least, give a warning about file sizes mismatch. Sincerely, i don't know why browsers have such an absurd behaviour, making you think it's finished OK since many years ago... Just my opinion 2010-02-10 19:40 |
Webmaster | @2ch-user: Unfortunately, it only will come in 2.0.4. @Jota.Ce: We unfortunately don't always know the size before downloading - and where we know it failed, we display that and an option to retry it. For why we aren't doing more, you'd need to ask the developers of the download manager code the whole Mozilla platform is using, including us. 2010-02-10 20:45 |
XFox from Italy | Quote of Jota.Ce: I want to thank your great work in SM2 again, and tell you i'm the only one who likes small buttons xD But as i'm not an active developer i have no rights to complaint about buttons, sizes, positions,... (or should i?). I don't know if it will have any effect but since I like very much the new small buttons (size and position), I've just posted my opinion as a comment of the bug. Please post your comment as well. 2010-02-11 20:57 |
Jota.Ce | |
franck from paris - france | thx for the x86_64 build. 2010-02-12 09:52 |