Good to see things moving again. :-)
12.04.2011 08:40
<< California: Here I was, here I go | The roads I take... | Integration eines Magento-2-Webshops mit FreeFinance und selbstgebautem Warenmanagement >>
Beitrag geschrieben von KaiRo und gepostet am 12. April 2011 04:04 | Tags: L10n, Mozilla, SeaMonkey, Status | 8 Kommentare | TrackBack
Kommentare
Autor | Beitrag |
---|---|
aus Brussels, Belgium | From that new build machines bug, I gather that the linux-x86_64 nightlies that I use, as well as any other L64 builds, are all built on one machine and are considered "experimental". Of course getting new machines is nice (I remember when SeaMonkey was being built on your own machines and then-experimental suiterunner builds for two of the three platforms couldn't even be pushed to where anyone could download them) and of course we can't expect all the luxury afforded Firefox; but I've been running Sm trunk x86_64 nightlies "live" for my day-to-day browsing, mail/news and chat since slightly over a month (let's say since openSUSE 11.3 was released on March 10) with no more trouble than the L32 builds I used before. However, I may be biased, since I am running this on a machine with a faster CPU, and a twin-core one, which means fewer deadlocks, races, etc. Good to see things moving again. :-) 12.04.2011 08:40 |
Webmaster | Tony, we don't want to ship anything as non-"experimental" that has no automated tests run, and with one machine, we don't have enough power to run them. The good side is that the new machines should be enough to get those tests up for 64bit Linux, so they should become "official" soon after we have those machines available. 12.04.2011 18:44 |
Vladimir aus NN Ru | Where can I find info about this strange folder? http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/releases/2.1b3-real/mac64/ 12.04.2011 20:30 |
Webmaster | Vladimir: Callek is doing all the release work now, but this "strange" folder is actually the official release. The "mac" and "mac64" folders should probably be identical, I have no idea why the "mac64" one was actually copied to "mac" instead of renamed to that, but I think only Callek can explain the details there. 13.04.2011 00:05 |
Justin Wood (Callek) | vlad: that strange folder was actually a mistake on my end, the only reason it exists in the mirrors is that it was created/pushed to mirrors before I removed it, and did my mac64->mac move after that, which of course, gives that old folder. I'll get a bug on file to add it to the exclusion list. 13.04.2011 03:20 |
rsx11m | Any schedule for comm-2.0 to branch off comm-central yet, now that Thunderbird has decided to base their Miramar releases on Gecko 5.0 (which used to be 2.2 until yesterday) and SeaMonkey 2.1 (possibly with calendar) de-facto "owns" that branch? [I don't dare to think (or to ask) what the consequences of the new mozilla-central release system and its aggressive schedule will be for the comm-central based applications, but sure hope to hear soon about it...] 13.04.2011 05:26 |
aus Brussels, Belgium | Quote of KaiRo: Tony, we don't want to ship anything as non-"experimental" that has no automated tests run, and with one machine, we don't have enough power to run them. The good side is that the new machines should be enough to get those tests up for 64bit Linux, so they should become "official" soon after we have those machines available. 13.04.2011 06:52 |
Vladimir aus NN Ru | Thanks Robert and Justin.-) And links (langpacks, contributed) in http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.1b3 are to deleted folder http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/releases/2.1b3/ 14.04.2011 07:27 |